Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Friday, October 25, 2019

Some comments on convergence in distribution

This is a note for myself.

Proposition. Let (Xn)n1 be a sequence of random variables. Suppose that, for each ϵ>0, there exist random variables (Yϵn)n1, (Zϵn)n1, and Yϵ such that Xn=Yϵn+Zϵn,YϵndnYϵ,lim supnE[|Zϵn|]ϵ. Then (Xn)n1 converges in distribution as n. Moreover, (Yϵ)ϵ>0 also converges in distribution to the same limit as ϵ0+.

Proof. By the assumption, it is clear that (Xn)n1 is tight. So it suffices to prove that there is a unique subsequential limit. To this end, note that |φXn(ξ)φYϵ(ξ)||φYϵn(ξ)φYϵ(ξ)|+E[|ξZϵn|]. If X is a subsequential limit of (Xn)n1, then taking limsup along the subsequence (nk)k1 for which Xnk converges in distribution to X, we get |φX(ξ)φYϵ(ξ)||ξ|ϵ. Since this is true for any ϵ>0, it follows that YϵX in distribution as ϵ0+. This shows that X is uniquely determined, and we are done.

Proposition. Let Ω be a Radon space equipped with the Borel probability measure P. Let (Xn)n1 and Y be random variables on Ω and μ be the law of Y. Suppose that (Xn)n1 converges in distribution under P(Y=y) for μ-almost every y. Then (Xn)n1 converges in distribution.

Proof. The assumption tells that φy(ξ):=limnE[eiξXnY=y] exists as characteristic function for μ-almost every y. Then by the Bounded Convergence Theorem, φ(ξ):=limnE[eiξXn]=RlimnE[eiξXnY=y]μ(dy)=Rφy(ξ)μ(dy) exists. Now, by the Bounded Convergence Theorem again, for any (ξk)k1 with ξk0, limkφ(ξk)=Rlimkφy(ξk)μ(dy)=1. Therefore the desired conclusion follows from Lévy's Continuity Theorem.

No comments:

Post a Comment