This is a note for myself.
Proposition. Let (Xn)n≥1 be a sequence of random variables. Suppose that, for each ϵ>0, there exist random variables (Yϵn)n≥1, (Zϵn)n≥1, and Yϵ such that Xn=Yϵn+Zϵn,Yϵnd→n→∞Yϵ,lim supn→∞E[|Zϵn|]≤ϵ. Then (Xn)n≥1 converges in distribution as n→∞. Moreover, (Yϵ)ϵ>0 also converges in distribution to the same limit as ϵ→0+.
Proof. By the assumption, it is clear that (Xn)n≥1 is tight. So it suffices to prove that there is a unique subsequential limit. To this end, note that |φXn(ξ)−φYϵ(ξ)|≤|φYϵn(ξ)−φYϵ(ξ)|+E[|ξZϵn|]. If X is a subsequential limit of (Xn)n≥1, then taking limsup along the subsequence (nk)k≥1 for which Xnk converges in distribution to X, we get |φX(ξ)−φYϵ(ξ)|≤|ξ|ϵ. Since this is true for any ϵ>0, it follows that Yϵ→X in distribution as ϵ→0+. This shows that X is uniquely determined, and we are done. ◻
Proposition. Let Ω be a Radon space equipped with the Borel probability measure P. Let (Xn)n≥1 and Y be random variables on Ω and μ be the law of Y. Suppose that (Xn)n≥1 converges in distribution under P(⋅∣Y=y) for μ-almost every y. Then (Xn)n≥1 converges in distribution.
Proof. The assumption tells that φy(ξ):=limn→∞E[eiξXn∣Y=y] exists as characteristic function for μ-almost every y. Then by the Bounded Convergence Theorem, φ(ξ):=limn→∞E[eiξXn]=∫Rlimn→∞E[eiξXn∣Y=y]μ(dy)=∫Rφy(ξ)μ(dy) exists. Now, by the Bounded Convergence Theorem again, for any (ξk)k≥1 with ξk→0, limk→∞φ(ξk)=∫Rlimk→∞φy(ξk)μ(dy)=1. Therefore the desired conclusion follows from Lévy's Continuity Theorem.
No comments:
Post a Comment