Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Sunday, February 12, 2017

A simple regulariation

(This is a slight modification of my old post.)

Proposition. Let f:(0,)C be a locally integrable function that satisfies the following conditions:

  1. For each ϵ>0 the following limit converges: I(ϵ)=limRRϵf(x)xdx
  2. There exist constants m=m(f) and c=c(f) such that I(ϵ)=mlogϵ+c+o(1)as ϵ0+.
Then the Laplace transform Lf(x) is a well-defined continuous function on (0,) and we have c=limϵ0+R(RϵLf(s)dsmlogR)mγ, where γ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

Remark. Before the actual proof, we make some remarks.

  1. If in addition that limx0+f(x) converges, then this limit is exactly m(f): m(f)=limx0+f(x) This renders m(f) uninteresting in most applications.
  2. c(f) can be represented by the integral c(f)=0f(x)m(f)1(0,1)(x)xdx=10f(x)m(f)xdx+1f(x)xdx.
  3. If we impose a strong assumption on f, the proof greatly simplifies. The following lengthy proof is only meaningful when a full generality is needed.

Proof. Let g:(0,)C and J:(0,)C be defined by g(x)=f(x)m1(0,1)(x)x,J(ϵ)=limRRϵg(x)dx. By the assumption, J is well-defined and satisfies c=limx0+J(x),0=limxJ(x). In particular, J extends to a continuous function on [0,] and hence bounded. Now using the identity J(x)=g(x) on (0,), for 0<ϵ<1<R we have Rϵf(x)esxdx=m1ϵesxdxRϵxJ(x)esxdx=m1ϵesxdx[xJ(x)esx]Rϵ+RϵJ(x)(1sx)esxdx. For s>0, taking ϵ0+ and R shows that the expression above converges to Lf(s):=limϵ0+RRϵf(x)esxdx=m1ess+0J(x)(1sx)esxdx. An easy but important remark is that the last integral converges absolutely for s>0. Now by the simple estimate Rϵ0(sx)αesxdxds=RϵΓ(α+1)sds< that holds true for α>1, we can apply Fubini's theorem to write RϵLf(s)ds=mRϵ1essds+0J(x)(Rϵ(1sx)esxds)dx=m[(1es)logs]RϵmRϵeslogsds+0J(x)(ReRxϵeϵx)dx. From this computation, it follows that limϵ0+R(RϵLf(s)dsmlogR)=mγ+c. This proves (1) as expected. ////

In many applications, the logarithmic term is cancelled out and thus the primary interest lies in the value of c=c(f). An easy observation is that both m and c are linear. A less obvious properties are summarized in the following table.

Transformation Relation Conditions
g(x)=f(xp) c(g)=1pc(f) p>0
g(x)=f(px) c(g)=c(f)m(f)logp p>0
g(x)=f(x)eαx c(g)=c(f)α0Lf(s)ds (α)>0

It is worth it noting that m(g)=m(f) in all of the transformations listed above. Next, the following table summaries some well-known values of c.

Function f(x) Value of m(f) Value of c(f) Conditions
ex f(0)=1 γ
cosx f(0)=1 γ
1(1+x)p f(0)=1 Hp1 p>0
xex1 f(0)=1 0

Here are some easy examples.

Example 1. Let p,q>0. Then 0cos(xp)exp(xq)xdx=c{cos(xp)exp(xq)}=1pc{cosx}1qc{ex}=γ(1q1p).

Example 2. Let α,β>0. Then 01x(11+α2x2cos(βx))dx=c{11+α2x2cos(βx)}=12c{11+x}c{cosx}log(αβ)=γlog(αβ).

Example 3. The Laplace transform of the Bessel function J0 of the first kind and order 0 is given by[1] L{J0}(s)=1s2+1 Using this and m(J0)=J0(0)=1, we find that c(J0)=limR(R0L{J0}(s)dslogR)γ=limR(arsinh(R)logR)γ=log2γ. This also shows 0J0(x)1(0,1)(x)xdx=log2γ.

No comments:

Post a Comment